Private Sector Forges Frameworks – Leaving Public Sector Coaching Behind?

Coaching and Mentoring in the Private SectorPublic sector coaching may be in danger of being left behind, while private corporations develop increasingly robust processes to monitor outcomes – according to a new report from the Institute of Business Consulting (IBC) together with the European Mentoring and Coaching Council (EMCC) and reported in HR Magazine. The qualitative survey says organisational buyers lack common standards and diverge in their approach – partly in response to the UK’s current economic pressures. As a result, the future of coaching may look markedly different between the public and private sectors in the coming years.

The IBC/EMCC study focused on areas including selection, monitoring and desired outcomes. They discovered diverse perspectives regarding what organisations considered ‘the right conditions’ for effective and cost-effective coaching.

The research quizzed participants about the nature and extent of sponsors’ involvement at all stages of the cycle (sourcing, selecting and matching coaches; involvement in setting coaching objectives and contracting; evaluation; ROI). Many public sector sponsors appear to be more ‘light touch’, relying on selection procedures for quality assurance and accountability.

Mentoring and Coaching business leadersHowever, most private sector sponsors deem this unsatisfactory and are tightening up considerably. Says LeaderShape Director, Chris Gulliver“The private sector has become highly value-for-money conscious, robust contracting and close sponsor involvement being the cornerstones of ROI. Corporate senior managers refer to a ‘new reality’ with emphasis on an unwavering focus on the agreed agenda and outcomes.”

‘New reality’ is not a merely a euphemism for expecting coaches to become more directive or didactic to meet the sponsor’s brief. Private sector sponsors strongly express the need for coaches to demonstrate:-

  • understanding of sponsor’s business sector or organisation   
  • commercial awareness
  • consulting skills: understanding the brief within the corporate context; clearly stating what would be delivered and how, plus an alignment with the company’s internal procedures.

LeaderShape’s Chris Gulliver notes: “This vision shifts from earlier days when clients’ ownership of the agenda was regarded as paramount and the organisation took business benefits on trust. The approach may depend on usage; public sector coaching is often seen particularly as an asset to support radical structural and other change.

“By contrast, most of the corporate respondents placed a high value upon their coaches’ understanding of their business and sector, rather than skillset.”

The survey noted terms such as ‘affinity’, and ‘culture fit’ becoming prerequisites for hiring, with evidence being demanded regarding “what good leadership looks like in my field. Previous similar experience has become mandatory in some private businesses backed by references, referral and sector pedigree. Registers have been closed to enable selected coaches to develop a solid understanding of one company.

Coaches themselves are demonstrating increasing preoccupation with ROI tools but sponsors are recognising their responsibility to monitor whether the investment has been worthwhile. Sponsors also aired some frustration about fully engaging line managers in contracting and evaluation.

These concerns are reflected quantitatively in a very recent LeaderShape survey with Hays Senior Finance indicating that, while multi-millions of pounds are spent on coaching across the UK, nearly one in seven organisations (15%) have no formal measurements in place to assess their programmes.

The coaching community’s professional bodies have been striving towards professionalism, defining and setting standards through qualifications and individual accreditation. By contrast, coaches have concerns about business pressures to ‘throw money’ at a problem and gain quick wins, rather than act strategically. This is acute, they say, where managers are implementing radical cuts, perhaps for the first time in their careers.

Individual preferences, reflecting organisational culture and structure are emerging piecemeal, with the key decision makers forging their own path. As the number of coaches grows, businesses strongly express the need to see a differentiated offering. Companies say attempts to ensure coaches represent different approaches and specialities are proving onerous; they drily note they still end up with ‘too many white women with a background in HR’.

A further split is seen whereby public sector, pooled, reciprocal internal coaching registers are appearing. To improve the standards for internal coaches, Post Graduate Certificates are emerging such as LeaderShape’s unique PGC in Coach-Mentoring and Facilitation in Organisations, accredited by the University of Chester, which covers the spectrum of needs for internal coach training. However, says Chris Gulliver:  “Even where internal coaching capability expands, external suppliers are still preferred at the most senior levels, partly for reasons of confidentiality and partly to bring in the greatest expertise. Kudos is also as a factor!”

The IBC/EMCC survey identified an ‘ideal’ style – inherently non-directive, characterised by a high degree of attentiveness and concentration, with vigorous challenge and skilful feedback (as well as strong adherence to set objectives, as previously noted). Benefits identified included structured reflection, raising self awareness and confidence, better strategic working and countering loneliness in leadership. Risks include dependency and anxiety about the sustainability of behaviour change. ‘Onboarding’ coaching for newly appointed senior executives was mentioned by a few, mostly private sector participants, but always in glowing terms regarding settling new talent into senior positions.

LeaderShape mentors and coaches are experienced former CEOs and other Business Leaders whose knowledge base allows for rapid understanding of the key issues faced at the most senior management and Board levels. LeaderShape exists for leaders and organisations dissatisfied with the conversion of business leadership training into effective behaviours and performance. Unlike temporary, short-term learning often associated with conventional leadership training and business school seminars, the company provides bespoke programmes that embed accelerated leader maturity into the daily life of the organisation. For more information visit the LeaderShape website or call 0870 990 5576.

Advertisements

0 Responses to “Private Sector Forges Frameworks – Leaving Public Sector Coaching Behind?”



  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s




Advertisements

%d bloggers like this: